GONE TO CROATAN
And — the map is closed, but the autonomous zone is open. – Hakim Bey
The Temporary Autonomous Zone
The Psyhotopology of Everyday Life
Open at the site of tension.
There was a time when all four corners of the South Bronx pointed toward rows of burnt buildings. If history repeats itself, as the contradictions of capital seem to reveal, then today’s vacant properties in New York City share a haunting reflection with its not so distant past in a 1970s Bronx.
The collapse of the Keynesian model caused a halt in the housing market, despite an existing economic structure that was guaranteed to fix itself. Instead, foreclosures increased across the city and manifested as vacant property. The local government and private sector failed to support those directly hurt by the crisis, which is seen again in today’s economic crisis.
We have people living on streets next to vacant homes. A lack of power experienced by low-income people creates tension towards new logic, and alternative parallels: direct action – squatting – and a legal push to re-instate urban homesteading.
Frank Morales, a self-identified squatter, who once pried open vacant buildings in the South Bronx with a crowbar, asserts we “need to create heat in the streets” by direct action. At the same time, the current economic crisis has caused community organizations to coalesce and gather strength to rise against the authority of city government through permanent homesteading means.
Mobilization means communities work in unity to govern their own buildings, based on creativity and the knowledge they already own. Where instead of waiting for the city to turn on the heat during winter, residents occupying buildings create their own access to heat by removing parts of a washing machine to connect to the boiler.
Time is the first distance compressed by squatting. Second is accessibility to housing and services. If the occupier receives title to a property, then distance in the power relationship compresses so that resistance causes property owners to acquiesce.
The question, however, is if we look at 1970s New York City, the city today, and imagine the city in 40 years – will these spaces be more difficult to find? Will homogeneity create a greater lack of power and fewer autonomous physical zones – or as according to Hakim Bey, will we always have the Temporary Autonomous Zone?
After city ordered police targeted a limelight and wrecking ball into one of Frank Morales’ residences in the Lower East Side, Frank told me he lived for a long time with his bags packed.
However, when I asked Frank what he thought of squatting and homesteading as a from of TAZ, he answered with response to his LES days squatting next to Hakim, where they disagreed on one
Frank views the struggle to gain housing for those who need it as a permanent space, whereas temporary is a state of mind. Perhaps resistance that provides foundation for the autonomous zone is temporary – depending on who shines the limelight.
What occurred daily in Guatemala did not appear in any newspaper, even in local print. It is deemed too insignificant for a world focused on billion dollar transactions and the fluctuating GDP of a country. In Guatemala, the collective efforts of indigenous Maya women to stand on their own economic feet is not in today’s headlines, yet it proves the slow march towards empowerment is undeniable.
Within the parameters of the world’s current state of affairs, a challenge to the status quo is imperative for the success of women. On the periphery, yet at the limits, their potential to breakdown barriers is contingent on an ability to articulate, internalize and then believe that aspirations for opportunity can be realized. These women do exactly what society suggests they cannot do.
Rooted in fear, any progress by women is viewed as a societal threat. Constraints keep women in place, even if the consequence is a detriment to society. After living and working with women in their pursuit of economic opportunity in agriculture, I viewed a resulting social value in how sustaining the status quo confines progress. Existing in one of the Western hemisphere’s most impoverished countries, I recognized that I lived in full insecurity, where little could be provided.
Guatemala is not a failed state, yet beneath the surface, the access to health, education and economic opportunity proves insufficient. Illiteracy leaves citizens without a voice in their local government. Residue from a 36-year internal conflict, which originated from liberal economic and agrarian reform, yet resulted in a United States backed coup and guerrilla war, led to the death and disappearance of thousands. La Violencia’s remnants limit individual decisions to this day, despite the indigenous rights and socio-economic agrarian progress of the 1996 Peace Accords. Compounded on the community level, I saw not only the catalysts, but also the consequences of the political organization of Guatemala operate within, yet against, the country’s underlying complexity of social movements.
The points where political and socio-economic circumstances lie within the curve of global development provide questions to be asked. How does binding one’s full potential, in Guatemala or elsewhere, affect the state of world affairs? Listening, questioning, and building relationships with those who possess an ability to identify their resources, process their histories, and determine what is urgent in their own lives are what, in the end, push the status quo beyond its limit. It is what extinguishes fear.
Resistance to suppression, inequality, and violence, is principally met by the social and economic participation of women. Collectively, women are able to create income, secure food and savings for their family, and offer education. Within the confines of their own home, they have more say, and slowly they become more active in the community, laying the groundwork for future political participation. This engagement in society creates an empowerment that is visible beyond the frame, and ultimately enables women to assert their own stories.
Breaking down barriers, not only for themselves but also for the future world of their daughters, fights the political and socio-economic reality. The right to participate in society, and the right for women to create a change that is pushed beyond the limits of societal resistance ultimately exposes resilience beneath the surface.
In adversity, these photographs represent a deviation from the norm: the collectiveness of women against illusory limits. Where female empowerment confronts ostracism, a life’s re-evaluation has the potential to sensitize us to obstacles and complexities on the road towards a tangible reality behind empowerment. What we see and experience becomes our potential, one woman’s potential, and the potential of our society.